Skip to content

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

This probably won't be needed, but I'm curious to see if we could instead have worked around #147556 by setting MKDIR_P.

r? ghost

@rustbot rustbot added A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 11, 2025
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try jobs=aarch64-gnu,aarch64-gnu-debug,aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-1,aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-2

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2025
(DO NOT MERGE) ci: Set `MKDIR_P` to work around a libffi-sys build failure

try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-1
try-job: aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-2
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Oct 11, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: f315c68 (f315c683dfe89f988b591fac865e3eec8a733f2c, parent: 9725c4baacef19345e13f91b27e66e10ef5592ae)

@Zalathar Zalathar added S-experimental Status: Ongoing experiment that does not require reviewing and won't be merged in its current state. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-experimental Status: Ongoing experiment that does not require reviewing and won't be merged in its current state. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants